[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z73L5_wrBWudDemZ@cassiopeiae>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:55:51 +0100
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/sched: Remove kthread header
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> The kthread header doesn't need to be included anymore. It's a relict
> from the days when the scheduler was still using a kthread instead of
> workqueues.
>
> Remove the unneeded includes.
>
> Fixes: a6149f039369 ("drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread")
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
> ---
> I'm not sure whether we should Cc the stable kernel. It's inconvenient
> and makes build times slower, but isn't really a bug.
I don't think that's needed. Analogous to the previous patch of this series, I
don't even think it should have a 'Fixes' tag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists