[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1740483690.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 21:59:33 +0800
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>,
Michael Wang <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Kaiyang Zhao <kaiyang2@...cmu.edu>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched/numa: Introduce per cgroup numa balance control
Introduce a per-cgroup interface to enable NUMA balancing
for specific cgroups. The system administrator needs to set
the NUMA balancing mode to NUMA_BALANCING_CGROUP=4 to enable
this feature. When in the NUMA_BALANCING_CGROUP mode, all
cgroups' NUMA balancing is disabled by default. After the
administrator enables this feature for a specific cgroup,
NUMA balancing for that cgroup is enabled.
This per-cgroup NUMA balancing control was once proposed in
2019 by Yun Wang[1]. Then, in 2024, Kaiyang Zhao mentioned
that he was working with Meta on per-cgroup NUMA control[2]
during a discussion with David Rientjes.
I could not find further discussion regarding per-cgroup NUMA
balancing from that point on. This set of RFC patches is a
rough and compile-passed version, and may have unhandled cases
(for example, THP). It has not been thoroughly tested and is
intended to initiate or resume the discussion on the topic of
per-cgroup NUMA load balancing.
The first patch is a NUMA load balancing statistics enhancement.
The second patch introduces per-cgroup NUMA balancing. The third
one enhances NUMA load balancing for the MPOL_INTERLEAVE policy.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/60b59306-5e36-e587-9145-e90657daec41@linux.alibaba.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ZrukILyQhMAKWwTe@localhost.localhost/T/
Chen Yu (3):
sched/numa: Introduce numa balance task migration and swap in
schedstats
sched/numa: Introduce per cgroup numa balance control
sched/numa: Allow intervale memory allocation for numa balance
include/linux/numa.h | 1 +
include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
include/linux/sched/sysctl.h | 1 +
include/linux/vm_event_item.h | 2 ++
include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/sched/debug.c | 4 ++++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 +++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 +++
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
mm/mempolicy.c | 7 ++++++
mm/mprotect.c | 5 ++--
mm/vmstat.c | 2 ++
14 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists