[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z73M3Ua6u1FpgBEK@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:59:57 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
Dumitru Ceclan <mitrutzceclan@...il.com>,
Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>,
Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@...il.com>,
Alisa-Dariana Roman <alisadariana@...il.com>,
Ramona Alexandra Nechita <ramona.nechita@...log.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] property: Add
device_get_child_node_count_named()
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 03:29:17PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 25/02/2025 12:39, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:29:31PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > On 25/02/2025 12:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
...
> > > > >
> > > > > I did not check how many users are you proposing for this, but if
> > > > > there's only one, then IMO this should not be a global function yet.
> > > > > It just feels to special case to me. But let's see what the others
> > > > > think.
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that if somebody hides it, we might potentially see
> > > > a duplication in the future. So I _slightly_ prefer to publish and
> > > > then drop that after a few cycles if no users appear.
> > >
> > > After taking a very quick grep I spotted one other existing place where we
> > > might be able to do direct conversion to use this function.
> > >
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c
> > >
> > > That'd be 2 users.
> >
> > I haven't checked myself, I believe your judgement,
>
> I took a better look and you obviously shouldn't believe :) The gianfar used
> of_node instead of the fwnode. So, it'd be a single caller at starters.
...which is the same as dev_of_node(), which means that you can use your
function there.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists