lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd6a84cd-ff17-45df-becc-9bfc74522f73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:14:34 +0200
From: Mihalcea Laurentiu <laurentiumihalcea111@...il.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
 Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Shengjiu Wang
 <shengjiu.wang@....com>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: imx8mp: convert 'aips5' to 'aipstz5'


On 21.02.2025 21:56, Frank Li wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 02:19:08PM -0500, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:
>> From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@....com>
>>
>> AIPS5 is actually AIPSTZ5 as it offers some security-related
>> configurations. Since these configurations need to be applied before
>> accessing any of the peripherals on the bus, it's better to make AIPSTZ5
>> be their parent instead of keeping AIPS5 and adding a child node for
>> AIPSTZ5. Also, because of the security configurations, the address space
>> of the bus has to be changed to that of the configuration registers.
> The orginal 0x30c0_0000..0x31200000 include 0x30df0000, why not map only
> config address part in your drivers.
>
> Frank


Any concerns/anything wrong with current approach?


I find it a bit awkward to have the whole bus address space

in the DT given that we're only interested in using the access

controller register space.


I'm fine with the approach you suggested but I don't see a

reason for using it?


>
>> Finally, since AIPSTZ5 belongs to the AUDIOMIX power domain, add the
>> missing 'power-domains' property. The domain needs to be powered on before
>> attempting to configure the security-related registers.
>>
>> The DT node name is not changed to avoid potential issues with DTs in
>> which this node is referenced.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@....com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi | 8 +++++---
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi
>> index e0d3b8cba221..a1d9b834d2da 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi
>> @@ -1399,11 +1399,13 @@ eqos: ethernet@...f0000 {
>>  			};
>>  		};
>>
>> -		aips5: bus@...00000 {
>> -			compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus";
>> -			reg = <0x30c00000 0x400000>;
>> +		aips5: bus@...f0000 {
>> +			compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-aipstz", "simple-bus";
>> +			reg = <0x30df0000 0x10000>;
>> +			power-domains = <&pgc_audio>;
>>  			#address-cells = <1>;
>>  			#size-cells = <1>;
>> +			#access-controller-cells = <0>;
>>  			ranges;
>>
>>  			spba-bus@...00000 {
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ