[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250225151720.29911b4b@fedora.home>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:17:20 +0100
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, davem@...emloft.net,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Heiner
Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean
<vladimir.oltean@....com>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12/13] net: phy: phylink: Use phy_caps_lookup
for fixed-link configuration
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:04:40 +0100
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:53:28 +0000
> "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:44:31PM +0100, Kory Maincent wrote:
> > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:27:24 +0100
> > > Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > When phylink creates a fixed-link configuration, it finds a matching
> > > > linkmode to set as the advertised, lp_advertising and supported modes
> > > > based on the speed and duplex of the fixed link.
> > > >
> > > > Use the newly introduced phy_caps_lookup to get these modes instead of
> > > > phy_lookup_settings(). This has the side effect that the matched
> > > > settings and configured linkmodes may now contain several linkmodes (the
> > > > intersection of supported linkmodes from the phylink settings and the
> > > > linkmodes that match speed/duplex) instead of the one from
> > > > phy_lookup_settings().
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > >
> > > > linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Pause_BIT, mask);
> > > > linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT, mask);
> > > > @@ -588,9 +591,9 @@ static int phylink_parse_fixedlink(struct phylink *pl,
> > > >
> > > > phylink_set(pl->supported, MII);
> > > >
> > > > - if (s) {
> > > > - __set_bit(s->bit, pl->supported);
> > > > - __set_bit(s->bit, pl->link_config.lp_advertising);
> > > > + if (c) {
> > > > + linkmode_or(pl->supported, pl->supported, match);
> > > > + linkmode_or(pl->link_config.lp_advertising,
> > > > pl->supported, match);
> > >
> > > You are doing the OR twice. You should use linkmode_copy() instead.
> >
> > No, we don't want to copy pl->supported to
> > pl->link_config.lp_advertising. We just want to set the linkmode bit
> > that corresponds to the speed/duplex in each mask.
> >
> > That will result in e.g. the pause mode bits will be overwritten despite
> > being appropriately set in the advertising mask in the code above this.
>
> Ok, so the right thing should be this:
> linkmode_or(pl->link_config.lp_advertising, pl->link_config.lp_advertising,
> match)
That looks right indeed, I'll address that for the next iteration.
Thanks for reviewing,
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists