[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z73uK5IzVoBej3mi@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:22:03 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/27] KVM: nVMX: Add a prerequisite to existence of
VMCS fields
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
> Add a prerequisite to existence of VMCS fields as some of them exist
> only on processors that support certain CPU features.
>
> This is required to fix KVM unit test VMX_VMCS_ENUM.MAX_INDEX.
If making the KVM-Unit-Test pass is the driving force for this code, then NAK.
We looked at this in detail a few years back, and came to the conclusion that
trying to precisely track which fields are/aren't supported would likely do more
harm than good.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1629192673-9911-4-git-send-email-robert.hu@linux.intel.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists