[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e309c016-4dcb-49e3-945e-54ddadfbddb8@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:58:24 +0100
From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <lee@...nel.org>, <ukleinek@...nel.org>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<wbg@...nel.org>, <jic23@...nel.org>, <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
<olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] pwm: stm32-lp: add support for stm32mp25
On 2/25/25 13:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 07:01:47PM +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
>> }
>>
>> return pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev);
>> @@ -246,6 +413,7 @@ static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stm32_pwm_lp_pm_ops, stm32_pwm_lp_suspend,
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id stm32_pwm_lp_of_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "st,stm32-pwm-lp", },
>> + { .compatible = "st,stm32mp25-pwm-lp", },
>
> No driver data suggests device is backwards compatible. Commit msg
> suggests not, so that's confusing.
The LPTimer PWM driver takes benefit of the MFD parent driver to feed in
data, e.g. 'num_cc_chans'. Number of channels is now variable, on
STM32MP25 (e.g. not a single channel). But it can't be hard-coded as
compatible data. (there's only 1 channel on earlier LP Timer hardware
revision).
The hardware controller is a bit different, hence the new compatible.
Best regards,
Fabrice
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists