[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce3ce109-f38a-4053-808b-5cc75257f3f7@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:55:53 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Patrick Roy <roypat@...zon.co.uk>, rppt@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net, willy@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, song@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, jannh@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, tabba@...gle.com, jgowans@...zon.com,
graf@...zon.com, kalyazin@...zon.com, xmarcalx@...zon.com,
derekmn@...zon.com, jthoughton@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/12] KVM: Add capability to discover
KVM_GMEM_NO_DIRECT_MAP support
On 21.02.25 17:07, Patrick Roy wrote:
> Add a capability to let userspace discover whether guest_memfd supports
> removing its folios from the direct map. Support depends on guest_memfd
> itself being supported, but also on whether KVM can manipulate the
> direct map at page granularity at all (possible most of the time, just
> arm64 is a notable outlier where its impossible if the direct map has
> been setup using hugepages, as arm64 cannot break these apart due to
> break-before-make semantics).
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Roy <roypat@...zon.co.uk>
> ---
Not sure how KVM folks handle that, but I suspect we would just want to
squash that into the previous commit,
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists