[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2ff27d1a-cda2-4dec-ae9b-23b63f20febb@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 19:09:49 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] at24: Drop of_match_ptr() and ACPI_PTR() protections
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025, at 11:48, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025, at 11:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:29:05AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025, at 11:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >
>> >> Subject: [PATCH] [SUBMITTED 20240403] spi: remove incorrect of_match_ptr
>> >> annotations
>> >
>> > Was it applied (and the rest you provided here)?
>>
>> It was part of a longer series. Some were applied, but the ones
>> I provided here are those that for some reason did not make it.
>> They should apply cleanly to today's linux-next.
>
> I can review them and give a tag if you issue a new version.
I've sent a bunch of those to maintainers directly now but
in the end forgot to Cc you. Let's see what gets accepted,
and then I'll send the rest as a series fro the endgame.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists