lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67be08921f167_25ccfc294bb@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:14:42 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Marcus Wichelmann <marcus.wichelmann@...zner-cloud.de>, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, 
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch, 
 davem@...emloft.net, 
 edumazet@...gle.com, 
 kuba@...nel.org, 
 pabeni@...hat.com, 
 andrii@...nel.org, 
 eddyz87@...il.com, 
 mykolal@...com, 
 ast@...nel.org, 
 daniel@...earbox.net, 
 martin.lau@...ux.dev, 
 song@...nel.org, 
 yonghong.song@...ux.dev, 
 john.fastabend@...il.com, 
 kpsingh@...nel.org, 
 sdf@...ichev.me, 
 haoluo@...gle.com, 
 jolsa@...nel.org, 
 shuah@...nel.org, 
 hawk@...nel.org, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] XDP metadata support for tun driver

Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
> Am 25.02.25 um 15:55 schrieb Willem de Bruijn:
> > Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marcus Wichelmann <marcus.wichelmann@...zner-cloud.de>
> >> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > 
> > Please don't add tags, unless a person has explicitly added them.
> > 
> > And they are only sticky when the code has not been changed since
> > they added them.
> > 
> > These are only in the cover letter, so not picked up. But for future
> > revisions and patches.
> 
> Oh, I'm sorry. I checked https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
> but must have misunderstood it then.
> 
> To clarify:
> So these tags are limited to a single patch of the patch series and I should only
> carry them over, when the single patch where they were added to is re-sent in a
> follow-up patch series without changes?

That's right.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ