[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250225182054.471759017@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:20:06 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ftrace: Check against is_kernel_text() instead of kaslr_offset()
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
As kaslr_offset() is architecture dependent and also may not be defined by
all architectures, when zeroing out unused weak functions, do not check
against kaslr_offset(), but instead check if the address is within the
kernel text sections. If KASLR added a shift to the zeroed out function,
it would still not be located in the kernel text. This is a more robust
way to test if the text is valid or not.
Fixes: ef378c3b8233 ("scripts/sorttable: Zero out weak functions in mcount_loc table")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250224180805.GA1536711@ax162/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5225b07b-a9b2-4558-9d5f-aa60b19f6317@sirena.org.uk/
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 183f72cf15ed..bec7b5dbdb3b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -7004,7 +7004,6 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod,
unsigned long count;
unsigned long *p;
unsigned long addr;
- unsigned long kaslr;
unsigned long flags = 0; /* Shut up gcc */
unsigned long pages;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -7056,9 +7055,6 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod,
ftrace_pages->next = start_pg;
}
- /* For zeroed locations that were shifted for core kernel */
- kaslr = !mod ? kaslr_offset() : 0;
-
p = start;
pg = start_pg;
while (p < end) {
@@ -7072,7 +7068,18 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod,
* object files to satisfy alignments.
* Skip any NULL pointers.
*/
- if (!addr || addr == kaslr) {
+ if (!addr) {
+ skipped++;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If this is core kernel, make sure the address is in core
+ * or inittext, as weak functions get zeroed and KASLR can
+ * move them to something other than zero. It just will not
+ * move it to an area where kernel text is.
+ */
+ if (!mod && !(is_kernel_text(addr) || is_kernel_inittext(addr))) {
skipped++;
continue;
}
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists