[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z74fBQLeXxuiBC-U@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 11:50:29 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: nVMX: Always use IBPB to properly virtualize IBRS
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On synthesized nested VM-exits in VMX, an IBPB is performed if IBRS is
> advertised to the guest to properly provide separate prediction domains
> for L1 and L2. However, this is currently conditional on
> X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB, which depends on the host spectre_v2_user
> mitigation.
>
> In short, if spectre_v2_user=no, IBRS is not virtualized correctly and
> L1 becomes suspectible to attacks from L2. Fix this by performing the
> IBPB regardless of X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB.
>
> Fixes: 2e7eab81425a ("KVM: VMX: Execute IBPB on emulated VM-exit when guest has IBRS")
> Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
> ---
Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists