[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025022528-humble-chatter-4e7d@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 05:32:46 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: Alan Mackenzie <acm@....de>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: More than 256/512 glyphs on the Liinux console
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 09:08:50PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 24. 02. 25, 19:22, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hello, Greg.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 08:47:53 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 03:36:12PM +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 09:48:32 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > [ .... ]
> >
> > > > But I think you are also asking why I use the console at all. That's
> > > > a fair question which I'll try to answer.
> >
> > > I'm not disputing using the console, it's the vt layer that I'm talking
> > > about. The DRM developers have the long-term goal of getting rid of
> > > CONFIG_VT which will remove a ton of mess that we have overall.
> > > DRM-based consoles should provide the same functionality that a vt
> > > console does today. If not, please let them know so that the remaining
> > > corner cases can be resolved.
> >
> > Does a DRM based console exist at the moment? I spent quite some time
> > looking for it yesterday, but found nothing.
>
> I didn't read the thread, but are you looking e.g. for kmscon?
Yes, that is what I was referring to, but couldn't remember the name,
thanks for the pointer.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists