[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z74-VwtwSa3k2E0m@gallifrey>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:04:07 +0000
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david@...etel.com
Subject: Re: users of drivers/misc/echo ?
* Harald Welte (laforge@...monks.org) wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 06:39:06PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > Actually, looking at DAHDI, I really don't think anyone is still using
> > > the dahdi_echocan_oslec code. It is disabled by default and only built
> > > if explicitly enabled by the user, and indeed if anyone did that it
> > > would fail to build for any kernels that have moved it out of staging.
> >
> > It looks like Debian is including and enabling it in it's DKMS build:
>
> thanks, I didn't realize that. You could reach out to the Debian maintainer of the package
> if you'd want clarification.
Given that Debian build etc - what's your preference? I'm happy to
grind a patch to remove the kernel copy if Debian is using their own copy.
Or do we leave it and fix up Debian to use it?
Dave
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org> https://laforge.gnumonks.org/
> ============================================================================
> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
> (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists