linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.13 000/138] 6.13.5-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025022548-swiftness-supervise-ae80@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:46:09 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.13 000/138] 6.13.5-rc1 review

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 20:52, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.5 release.
> > > There are 138 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> >
> > This and 6.12 are broken on several platforms by "gpiolib: check the
> > return value of gpio_chip::get_direction()", as reported upstream
> > several drivers break the expectations that this commit has.
> > 96fa9ec477ff60bed87e1441fd43e003179f3253 "gpiolib: don't bail out if
> > get_direction() fails in gpiochip_add_data()" was merged upstream which
> > makes this non-fatal, but it's probably as well to just not backport
> > this to stable at all.
> 
> Agreed, this can be dropped. It never worked before so it's not a
> regression fix.

Ok, thanks, I'll drop it from all stable queues and push out some new
-rc2 releases.

greg k-h