[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <abeaac9dadaddc3b95826eb12ee169558a271bbe.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:28:51 -0800
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, qmo@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chen.dylane@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/5] Add prog_kfunc feature probe
On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 01:13 +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
[...]
> Hi Eduard,
> I used a simple script to find all kfunc prog types and comapre it with
> your program, most of them are consistent, the results are as follows,
> and i add pathch 4 additionally to fix kfunc probe like
> bpf_session_is_return.
Hi Tao,
Thank you for putting together the python script. I double checked
output of the script and the output of the test and find these
consistent.
(I noticed that a few kfuncs are in the vmlinux.h but are not printed
by the test:
- bpf_skb_get_xfrm_info
- bpf_skb_set_xfrm_info
- bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state
- bpf_xdp_xfrm_state_release
- bpf_dynptr_from_skb
- bpf_dynptr_from_xdp
- bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path
but that is another topic).
Thanks,
Eduard
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists