[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3cc7f2a-ea0c-42a0-940c-95735d008989@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:07:37 +0200
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>, Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
Dumitru Ceclan <mitrutzceclan@...il.com>,
Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>,
Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@...il.com>,
Alisa-Dariana Roman <alisadariana@...il.com>,
Ramona Alexandra Nechita <ramona.nechita@...log.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] property: Add
device_get_child_node_count_named()
On 25/02/2025 11:40, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> +/**
>> + * device_get_child_node_count_named - number of child nodes with given name
>> + *
>> + * Scan device's child nodes and find all the nodes with a specific name and
>> + * return the number of found nodes. Potential '@...ber' -ending for scanned
>> + * names is ignored. Eg,
>> + * device_get_child_node_count(dev, "channel");
>> + * would match all the nodes:
>> + * channel { }, channel@0 {}, channel@...bba {}...
>> + *
>> + * @dev: Device to count the child nodes for
>> + *
>> + * Return: the number of child nodes with a matching name for a given device.
>> + */
>> +unsigned int device_get_child_node_count_named(const struct device *dev,
>> + const char *name)
>> +{
>> + struct fwnode_handle *child;
>> + unsigned int count = 0;
>> +
>> + device_for_each_child_node(dev, child)
>> + if (fwnode_name_eq(child, "channel"))
>
> s/"channel"/name/ ?
Thanks Heikki for spotting this brainfart! :)
>
>> + count++;
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count_named);
>
> I did not check how many users are you proposing for this, but if
> there's only one, then IMO this should not be a global function yet.
I have no strong opinion on this. It starts with just 1 user (IIO ADC
channel stuff), but I've a feeling there are other areas which do
look-up nodes by name. I suppose "channels" are looked-up in other areas
of IIO as well. Lookups are probably done outside the IIO as well. I
haven't audited this, but I wouldn't be surprized if at least LEDs (and
perhaps clks/regulators?) could find this useful too.
> It just feels to special case to me. But let's see what the others
> think.
Yeah :) And thanks for spotting the "channel" -thing :)
Yours,
-- Matti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists