[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UJb=-TsXS3bgv-rgiON5-4icGgh81gYEJuA=ieDaBT+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:40:39 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Damon Ding <damon.ding@...k-chips.com>
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, andy.yan@...k-chips.com, hjc@...k-chips.com,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
andrzej.hajda@...el.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com,
cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com, boris.brezillon@...labora.com,
l.stach@...gutronix.de, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/15] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Add irq flag
IRQF_NO_AUTOEN instead of calling disable_irq()
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:14 AM Damon Ding <damon.ding@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>
> The IRQF_NO_AUTOEN can be used for the drivers that don't want
> interrupts to be enabled automatically via devm_request_threaded_irq().
> Using this flag can provide be more robust compared to the way of
> calling disable_irq() after devm_request_threaded_irq() without the
> IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damon Ding <damon.ding@...k-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Suggested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists