lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kce6gzso22fp3ze2wp43fvy4tv6yqkaijm72kh5qk34jwijk2l@3ifaiz5tgjvl>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:45:27 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath12k@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-slim7x: Drop incorrect
 qcom,ath12k-calibration-variant

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:22:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/02/2025 10:50, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:30:51AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> There is no such property as qcom,ath12k-calibration-variant: neither in
> >> the bindings nor in the driver.  See dtbs_check:
> >>
> >>   x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x.dtb: wifi@0: 'qcom,ath12k-calibration-variant' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> >>
> > 
> > Adding Jeff and ath12k@ to the cc list. Is the driver able to find the
> > calibration variant in case it is not running on the ACPI system? I see
> > that it uses dmi_walk. Does it work in the non-ACPI case?
> 
> 
> But nothing parses such string as 'qcom,ath12k-calibration-variant' (see
> git grep), so how would driver use it?

That's what I'm asking: is the property redundant or is it correct and
it is a driver that needs to be fixed?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ