[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84bd530c-4fb9-4913-8ee1-78a6a4f46625@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:08:45 +0530
From: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>
To: Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, daniels@...labora.com,
helen.fornazier@...il.com, airlied@...il.com, simona.vetter@...ll.ch,
robdclark@...il.com, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
guilherme.gallo@...labora.com, sergi.blanch.torne@...labora.com,
valentine.burley@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/ci: fix merge request rules
Hi Daniel,
On 26/02/25 19:29, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Vignesh,
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 13:55, Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com> wrote:
>> Merge request pipelines were only created when changes
>> were made to drivers/gpu/drm/ci/, causing MRs that didn't
>> touch this path to break. Fix MR pipeline rules to trigger
>> jobs for all changes.
>
> Thanks a lot for fixing this up!
>
>> # Build everything after someone bypassed the CI
>> - if: *is-direct-push
>> when: on_success
>
> Should these be when: manual? I think it would be good to align with
> the rules we have for Mesa: run automatically for marge-bot and also
> for scheduled pipelines, but in all other cases (MR context but not
> scheduled for merge, direct push to ref, etc) be manual, so we don't
> overwhelm the CI by testing everything everyone pushed.
mesa has on_success for is-direct-push. Should we change it to manual
here and update the same in mesa ?
If a user creates a MR, should the jobs run automatically, since we do
not use marge-bot to merge MRs in drm?
I also noticed we need to remove reference to mesa
(CI_PROJECT_NAMESPACE). I will send v2 with this change.
Regards,
Vignesh
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists