linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/T2H SoC option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f134c607-2a03-4ee2-9f7a-befa1e4feb74@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:39:54 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@...renesas.com>,
 "thierry.bultel@...atsea.fr" <thierry.bultel@...atsea.fr>
Cc: "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
 "geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@...renesas.com>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/T2H SoC
 option

On 26/02/2025 15:32, Thierry Bultel wrote:
> Hi Krysztof,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> 
>> Sent: mercredi 26 février 2025 15:22
>> To: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@...renesas.com>; thierry.bultel@...atsea.fr
>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org; geert@...ux-m68k.org; Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@...renesas.com>; linux-arm->kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/T2H SoC option
>>
>> On 26/02/2025 14:09, Thierry Bultel wrote:
>>> Selects support for RZ/T2H (aka r9a09g077), and SCI (serial) specific 
>>> code for it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@...renesas.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@...renesas.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> You never responded to my comments at v1. So I asked at v2. Still no answer.
>>
>> That's v3 and still silence from your side.
> 
> Yes, I understand your position and have added a paragraph 
> at the end of the cover letter about this point.

We do no read cover letters, unless look for dependencies, so if you
disagree with someone you ought to respond to the email directly. Not
silently discard.

You keep adding more and more symbols, so your "out of scope of this
patchset" is no true. Otherwise every contributor will use exactly the
same arguments - "not my problem".

So again NAK because it is something ought to be finally fixed (and is
not even tricky to, so I don't ask for impossible).


Best regards,
Krzysztof