[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0b3db5a1-a57f-4ccb-9f7c-6df16d4319a5@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:47:25 +0100
From: "Sven Peter" <sven@...npeter.dev>
To: "Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>
Cc: "Janne Grunau" <j@...nau.net>, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] soc: apple: rtkit: Add APPLE_RTKIT_PWR_STATE_INIT
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, at 19:03, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
>> - msg = FIELD_PREP(APPLE_RTKIT_MGMT_PWR_STATE, APPLE_RTKIT_PWR_STATE_ON);
>> + msg = FIELD_PREP(APPLE_RTKIT_MGMT_PWR_STATE, APPLE_RTKIT_PWR_STATE_INIT);
>
> Commit message doesn't match the code. Just adding the state doesn't
> imply a behaviour change but the patch is one. How about "Use INIT state
> instead of ON" or something to make explicit the behaviour change?
Good point, will change the commit message to something like this for v2:
soc: apple: rtkit: Add and use PWR_STATE_INIT instead of _ON
This state is needed to wake the dcp IOP after m1n1 shut it down
and works for all other co-processors as well.
Thanks,
Sven
Powered by blists - more mailing lists