[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250226175833.16a7a970@p-imbrenda>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 17:58:33 +0100
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com, seiden@...ux.ibm.com,
nsg@...ux.ibm.com, schlameuss@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: s390: pv: fix race when making a page
secure
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:05:11 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> > +int make_hva_secure(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long hva, struct uv_cb_header *uvcb)
> > +{
> > + struct folio *folio;
> > + spinlock_t *ptelock;
> > + pte_t *ptep;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + ptep = get_locked_valid_pte(mm, hva, &ptelock);
> > + if (!ptep)
> > + return -ENXIO;
>
> You very likely need a pte_write() check we had there before, as you
> might effectively modify page content by clearing the page.
it's not really needed, but it doesn't hurt either, I'll add a check
Powered by blists - more mailing lists