linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] reset: mchp: sparx5: Fix for lan966x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250226182449.61a126ea@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 18:24:49 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Horatiu Vultur
 <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com, daniel.machon@...rochip.com,
 UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] reset: mchp: sparx5: Fix for lan966x

Hi Philipp, Horatiu,

On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 17:32:22 +0100
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:

...

> > Fixes: 0426a920d6269c ("reset: mchp: sparx5: Map cpu-syscon locally in case of LAN966x")
> > Reviewed-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
> > Tested-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>  
> 
> Is this still correct?

Yes, it is correct.

Reviewed this v3, saw Philipp's comments and I have nothing more to add.

Also tested this v3 and no regression were detected.

Best regards,
Hervé