linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 7/7] arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for FEAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z79TETeXBDG_c8ep@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 17:44:49 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/7] arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for
 FEAT_PMUv3p9

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:14:57AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:17 AM Anshuman Khandual
> <anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:
> > To summarize
> >
> > - Update arm64/booting.rst regarding MDCR_EL3.EnPM2
> > - Add above mentioned "Fixes:" tag and "CC: stable"
> > - But should respin this patch or send a fix up instead ?
> 
> It is not applied yet, right? So respin.

It's applied but I'm fine with a respin, especially if we need a cc
stable + Fixes, it's easier to track.

Just don't repost the whole series, the first 6 patches are on the arm64
for-next/sysreg branch.

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin