lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <your-ad-here.call-01740598679-ext-1013@work.hours>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:37:59 +0100
From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Fangrui Song <i@...kray.me>, Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/vDSO: fix GNU hash table entry size for
 s390x

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 12:52:31AM +0100, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:04:18PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Commit 14be4e6f3522 ("selftests: vDSO: fix ELF hash table entry size for s390x")
> > changed the type of the ELF hash table entries to 64bit on s390x.
> > However the *GNU* hash tables entries are always 32bit.
> > The "bucket" pointer is shared between both hash algorithms.
> --
> > On s390x the GNU algorithm assigns and dereferences this pointer to a
> > 64bit value as a pointer to a 32bit value, leading to compiler warnings and
> > runtime crashes.
> 
> I would rephrase it as follows:
> 
> On s390, this caused the GNU hash algorithm to access its 32-bit entries as if they
> were 64-bit, triggering compiler warnings (assignment between "Elf64_Xword *" and
> "Elf64_Word *") and runtime crashes.
> 
> And take it via s390 tree.
> 
> Shuah, if you don't mind, may I get your Acked-by?

Hello Shuah,

friendly ping. Could you please respond with "Acked-by" if you don’t
mind me taking this patch via the s390 tree? Or let me know if you plan
to take it via your tree.

Thank you!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ