[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250226195529.2314580-27-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:55:26 -0500
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 26/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Add parameter "kvm" to kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect()
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Add a parameter "kvm" to kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect() and its
caller tdp_mmu_need_write_protect().
This is a preparation to make cpu_dirty_log_size a per-VM value rather than
a system-wide value.
No function changes expected.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 12 ++++++------
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index 75f00598289d..86d6d4f82cf4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -187,7 +187,8 @@ static inline gfn_t kvm_gfn_root_bits(const struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_mm
return kvm_gfn_direct_bits(kvm);
}
-static inline bool kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static inline bool kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
/*
* When using the EPT page-modification log, the GPAs in the CPU dirty
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index e819d16655b6..a609d5b58b69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
if (sp->role.ad_disabled)
spte |= SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED;
- else if (kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect(sp))
+ else if (kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect(vcpu->kvm, sp))
spte |= SPTE_TDP_AD_WRPROT_ONLY;
spte |= shadow_present_mask;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 22675a5746d0..fd0a7792386b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1613,21 +1613,21 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_try_split_huge_pages(struct kvm *kvm,
}
}
-static bool tdp_mmu_need_write_protect(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static bool tdp_mmu_need_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
/*
* All TDP MMU shadow pages share the same role as their root, aside
* from level, so it is valid to key off any shadow page to determine if
* write protection is needed for an entire tree.
*/
- return kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect(sp) || !kvm_ad_enabled;
+ return kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect(kvm, sp) || !kvm_ad_enabled;
}
static void clear_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
{
- const u64 dbit = tdp_mmu_need_write_protect(root) ? PT_WRITABLE_MASK :
- shadow_dirty_mask;
+ const u64 dbit = tdp_mmu_need_write_protect(kvm, root) ?
+ PT_WRITABLE_MASK : shadow_dirty_mask;
struct tdp_iter iter;
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -1672,8 +1672,8 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
static void clear_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
gfn_t gfn, unsigned long mask, bool wrprot)
{
- const u64 dbit = (wrprot || tdp_mmu_need_write_protect(root)) ? PT_WRITABLE_MASK :
- shadow_dirty_mask;
+ const u64 dbit = (wrprot || tdp_mmu_need_write_protect(kvm, root)) ?
+ PT_WRITABLE_MASK : shadow_dirty_mask;
struct tdp_iter iter;
lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists