linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Let fprobe test consider already enabled functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250227085136.741479a6719e53b50a0cc489@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:51:36 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily
 Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Let fprobe test consider already
 enabled functions

On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:13:00 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 23:54:47 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, this ftrace selftests has been expected to be run without 
> > any BPF programs... Is there any other issue on other test cases?
> 
> Unfortunately, systemd is starting to add BPF programs :-p
> 
> I noticed that my laptop has users.

Ah, I might need systemd-busybox to build minimum test environment :-(

Thanks,

> 
> -- Steve


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>