[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6922f47-a804-491f-a3c1-1fd93b7b4edd@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:42:07 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, jgg@...dia.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
corbet@....net, will@...nel.org
Cc: joro@...tes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, robin.murphy@....com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, eric.auger@...hat.com, jean-philippe@...aro.org,
mdf@...nel.org, mshavit@...gle.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
smostafa@...gle.com, ddutile@...hat.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com,
praan@...gle.com, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/14] iommufd/fault: Move two fault functions out of
the header
On 2/26/25 01:25, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> There is no need to keep them in the header. The vEVENTQ version of these
> two functions will turn out to be a different implementation and will not
> share with this fault version. Thus, move them out of the header.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe<jgg@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian<kevin.tian@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen<nicolinc@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists