[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABi2SkUwETzrBSYm0QV9+eoeo0kgA+r2JM4QaFpQqeTiidFEDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:48:47 -0800
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, jannh@...gle.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org, oleg@...hat.com,
avagin@...il.com, benjamin@...solutions.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, jorgelo@...omium.org,
sroettger@...gle.com, hch@....de, ojeda@...nel.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, pedro.falcato@...il.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
willy@...radead.org, anna-maria@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Jason@...c4.com, deller@....de,
rdunlap@...radead.org, davem@...emloft.net, peterx@...hat.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, gerg@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...nel.org, ardb@...nel.org, mhocko@...e.com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
peterz@...radead.org, ardb@...gle.com, enh@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
groeck@...omium.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com,
mike.rapoport@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] mseal, system mappings: enable x86-64
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:08 AM Thomas Weißschuh
<thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:52:42PM +0000, jeffxu@...omium.org wrote:
> > From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
> >
> > Provide support for CONFIG_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS on x86-64,
> > covering the vdso, vvar, vvar_vclock.
> >
> > Production release testing passes on Android and Chrome OS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 87198d957e2f..8fa17032ca46 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ config X86_64
> > depends on 64BIT
> > # Options that are inherently 64-bit kernel only:
> > select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
> > + select ARCH_HAS_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
> > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 if CC_HAS_INT128
> > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK
> > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGE_PFNMAP if TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c
> > index 39e6efc1a9ca..1b1c009f20a8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c
> > @@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ static int map_vdso(const struct vdso_image *image, unsigned long addr)
> > struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > unsigned long text_start;
> > + unsigned long vm_flags;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm))
> > @@ -264,11 +265,12 @@ static int map_vdso(const struct vdso_image *image, unsigned long addr)
> > /*
> > * MAYWRITE to allow gdb to COW and set breakpoints
> > */
> > + vm_flags = VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_MAYREAD|VM_MAYWRITE|VM_MAYEXEC;
> > + vm_flags |= VM_SEALED_SYSMAP;
> > vma = _install_special_mapping(mm,
> > text_start,
> > image->size,
> > - VM_READ|VM_EXEC|
> > - VM_MAYREAD|VM_MAYWRITE|VM_MAYEXEC,
> > + vm_flags,
> > &vdso_mapping);
> >
> > if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> > @@ -276,11 +278,12 @@ static int map_vdso(const struct vdso_image *image, unsigned long addr)
> > goto up_fail;
> > }
> >
> > + vm_flags = VM_READ|VM_MAYREAD|VM_IO|VM_DONTDUMP|VM_PFNMAP;
> > + vm_flags |= VM_SEALED_SYSMAP;
> > vma = _install_special_mapping(mm,
> > addr,
> > (__VVAR_PAGES - VDSO_NR_VCLOCK_PAGES) * PAGE_SIZE,
> > - VM_READ|VM_MAYREAD|VM_IO|VM_DONTDUMP|
> > - VM_PFNMAP,
> > + vm_flags,
> > &vvar_mapping);
>
> This hunk (and the vvar mapping in the arm64 patch) will conflict with my
> "Generic vDSO datapage" series.
> That series is already part of the tip tree (branch timers/vdso) and scheduled
> for the next merge window.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=timers/vdso
>
> The conflict resolution is fairly easy:
> Move the new flag logic into lib/vdso/datastore.c
>
Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
In your change, it seems lib/vdso/datastore.c implements a
vdso_install_vvar_mapping(), then all the architectures call this
function.
So merging conflict won't be as straightforward. Maybe a better
approach is that I continue resolving all the comments, based on the
latest main. Then wait for your change to be merged and submit another
version.
Thanks
-Jeff
-Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists