[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc5af769-6d3a-4003-81c2-f5fe5cf8550c@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:09:32 +0000
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: hugetlb: Fix huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for
non-present ptes
On 25/02/2025 22:18, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:11:19PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 21/02/2025 15:31, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:04:15PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>>> + pte = __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>>>> + present = pte_present(pte);
>>>> + while (--ncontig) {
>>>> + ptep++;
>>>> + addr += pgsize;
>>>> + tmp_pte = __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>>>> + if (present) {
>>>> + if (pte_dirty(tmp_pte))
>>>> + pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
>>>> + if (pte_young(tmp_pte))
>>>> + pte = pte_mkyoung(pte);
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>
>>> nit: With the loop now structured like this, we really can't handle
>>> num_contig_ptes() returning 0 if it gets an unknown size. Granted, that
>>> really shouldn't happen, but perhaps it would be better to add a 'default'
>>> case with a WARN() to num_contig_ptes() and then add an early return here?
>>
>> Looking at other users of num_contig_ptes() it looks like huge_ptep_get()
>> already assumes at least 1 pte (it calls __ptep_get() before calling
>> num_contig_ptes()) and set_huge_pte_at() assumes 1 pte for the "present and
>> non-contig" case. So num_contig_ptes() returning 0 is already not really
>> consumed consistently.
>>
>> How about we change the default num_contig_ptes() return value to 1 and add a
>> warning if size is invalid:
>
> Fine by me!
>
> I assume you'll fold that in and send a new version, along with the typo
> fixes?
Yep, I'll aim to post this today. I have a few review comments for s390 to add
in too.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists