[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa24e5cf-3a32-4792-be0f-9b8d190730d2@icloud.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 18:49:31 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] of: Align macro MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS with
NR_FWNODE_REFERENCE_ARGS
On 2025/2/25 22:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> I would add here that the of.h includes fwnode.h already, so it doesn't
> add any new compile time dependency.
>
thank you Andy for comments.
include/linux/of.h:
struct device_node {
...
struct fwnode_handle fwnode; // this type is defined by fwnode.h
...
}
include/linux/fwnode.h:
struct fwnode_handle {...}
So of.h must include fwnode.h
Perhaps, of.h needs to include fwnode.h *explicitly* even if this is
another topic.
> Both patches LGTM,
> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists