[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <paotjsjnoezcdjj57dsy3ufuneezmlxbc3zk3ebfzuiq722kz2@6vhollkdhul7>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:33:10 +0100
From: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
CC: <kees@...nel.org>, <julian.stecklina@...erus-technology.de>,
<kevinloughlin@...gle.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<justinstitt@...gle.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <bhe@...hat.com>, <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <will@...nel.org>, <ardb@...nel.org>,
<jason.andryuk@....com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, <guoweikang.kernel@...il.com>,
<dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<apopple@...dia.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <rppt@...nel.org>,
<kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<glider@...gle.com>, <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, <kuan-ying.lee@...onical.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <tj@...nel.org>, <jgross@...e.com>,
<dvyukov@...gle.com>, <baohua@...nel.org>, <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
<dennis@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>, <surenb@...gle.com>,
<kbingham@...nel.org>, <ankita@...dia.com>, <nathan@...nel.org>,
<ziy@...dia.com>, <xin@...or.com>, <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, <cl@...ux.com>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <david@...hat.com>,
<jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, <corbet@....net>,
<maz@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <ytcoode@...il.com>,
<xur@...gle.com>, <morbo@...gle.com>, <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] kasan: sw_tags: Use arithmetic shift for shadow
computation
On 2025-02-25 at 22:37:58 +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 6:21 PM Maciej Wieczor-Retman
><maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> I wanted to have the shadow memory boundries aligned properly, to not waste page
>> >> table entries, so the memory map is more straight forward. This patch helps with
>> >> that, I don't think it would have worked without it.
>> >
>> >Ok, I see - let's add this info into the commit message then.
>>
>> Sure, but if you like the 0xffeffc0000000000 offset I'll just drop this part.
>
>Sure, assuming it works, I like this address :) But to be fair, I like
>any fixed address better than using a runtime const, just to avoid the
>complexity.
Btw just out of curiosity on the topic. If we used a runtime specified kasan
offset, could the gdb script issue (not knowing the offset at compile-time) be
fixed by just exporting the value through sysfs?
I know that in inline mode the compiler would still need to know the offset
value but I was curious if this approach was okay at least in outline mode?
--
Kind regards
Maciej Wieczór-Retman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists