[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e13e0922-f51f-4ce3-8ff4-3dbce41864c9@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:22:26 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: James Calligeros <jcalligeros99@...il.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@...com>,
Kevin Lu <kevin-lu@...com>, Baojun Xu <baojun.xu@...com>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shi Fu <shifu0704@...ndersoft.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/20] ASoC: tas2764: Crop SDOUT zero-out mask based
on BCLK ratio
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:07:41PM +1000, James Calligeros wrote:
> From: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
>
> As per the datasheet, SDOUT bits must be zeroed out if the
> corresponding TDM slot is invalid for a given clock ratio.
This seems like a fix?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists