lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202502280126.kuSX5nFF-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 02:00:40 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@...wei.com>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
	jgg@...dia.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
	jonathan.cameron@...wei.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...neuler.org,
	liulongfang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: fix XQE dma address error

Hi Longfang,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on awilliam-vfio/next]
[also build test WARNING on awilliam-vfio/for-linus linus/master v6.14-rc4 next-20250227]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Longfang-Liu/hisi_acc_vfio_pci-fix-XQE-dma-address-error/20250225-143347
base:   https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio.git next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250225062757.19692-2-liulongfang%40huawei.com
patch subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: fix XQE dma address error
config: loongarch-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250228/202502280126.kuSX5nFF-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250228/202502280126.kuSX5nFF-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502280126.kuSX5nFF-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c: In function 'vf_qm_version_check':
>> drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c:357:17: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
     357 |                 if (vf_data->major_ver < ACC_DRV_MAJOR_VER ||
         |                 ^~
   drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c:360:25: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if'
     360 |                         return -EINVAL;
         |                         ^~~~~~
   drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c: In function 'vf_qm_get_match_data':
   drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c:448:30: error: 'ACC_DRV_MAR' undeclared (first use in this function)
     448 |         vf_data->major_ver = ACC_DRV_MAR;
         |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c:448:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
   drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c:449:30: error: 'ACC_DRV_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function)
     449 |         vf_data->minor_ver = ACC_DRV_MIN;
         |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/if +357 drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c

   352	
   353	static int vf_qm_version_check(struct acc_vf_data *vf_data, struct device *dev)
   354	{
   355		switch (vf_data->acc_magic) {
   356		case ACC_DEV_MAGIC_V2:
 > 357			if (vf_data->major_ver < ACC_DRV_MAJOR_VER ||
   358			    vf_data->minor_ver < ACC_DRV_MINOR_VER)
   359				dev_info(dev, "migration driver version not match!\n");
   360				return -EINVAL;
   361			break;
   362		case ACC_DEV_MAGIC_V1:
   363			/* Correct dma address */
   364			vf_data->eqe_dma = vf_data->qm_eqc_dw[QM_XQC_ADDR_HIGH];
   365			vf_data->eqe_dma <<= QM_XQC_ADDR_OFFSET;
   366			vf_data->eqe_dma |= vf_data->qm_eqc_dw[QM_XQC_ADDR_LOW];
   367			vf_data->aeqe_dma = vf_data->qm_aeqc_dw[QM_XQC_ADDR_HIGH];
   368			vf_data->aeqe_dma <<= QM_XQC_ADDR_OFFSET;
   369			vf_data->aeqe_dma |= vf_data->qm_aeqc_dw[QM_XQC_ADDR_LOW];
   370			break;
   371		default:
   372			return -EINVAL;
   373		}
   374	
   375		return 0;
   376	}
   377	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ