[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8Cu2VJhDhum9mXd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 19:28:49 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@...il.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@....com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Utilize cpu-type for CPU matching
* Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 01:40:55PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Pawan Gupta (9):
> > > x86/cpu: Prepend 0x to the hex values in cpu_debug_show()
> > > cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get cpu-type
> > > perf/x86/intel: Use cache cpu-type for hybrid PMU selection
> > > x86/cpu: Remove get_this_hybrid_cpu_*()
> > > x86/cpu: Name CPU matching macro more generically (and shorten)
> > > x86/cpu: Add cpu_type to struct x86_cpu_id
> > > x86/cpu: Update x86_match_cpu() to also use cpu-type
> > > x86/bugs: Declutter vulnerable CPU list
> > > x86/rfds: Exclude P-only parts from the RFDS affected list
> >
> > So it looks like this series, despite being complete, fell between the
> > cracks during the usual end-of-year distractions.
> >
> > To get the ball rolling I have applied the first 4 patches to
> > tip:x86/cpu - the cpufreq one needed a small conflict resolution, and I
> > have adjusted the debug output of the first one to not break
> > pre-existing vertical tabulation.
>
> Thanks for picking this up.
>
> > Mind double checking the result in tip:x86/cpu and submit the remaining
> > 5 patches on top of it?
>
> I had quick look, fixes and merge resolution LGTM. I will submit the
> remaining 5 patches soonish.
Thanks!
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists