[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW6wuBjCo9ygCFhyYimEHg5ZNtN7-Yd+gWuMJPTU781vFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:50:26 -0800
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf tools: Skip BPF sideband event for userspace profiling
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:17 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The BPF sideband information is tracked using a separate thread and
> evlist. But it's only useful for profiling kernel and we can skip it
> when users profile their application only in userspace.
>
> It seems it already fails to open the sideband event in that case.
> Let's remove the noise in the verbose output anyway.
>
> Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
This turns out to be more complicated than I thought. I actually
like v1 better.
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists