[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025022714-specked-refocus-b701@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:30:16 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Check Rust signatures at compile time
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 05:01:58PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
It's a bit odd to sign off on a 0/X email with no patch or description
:)
Seriously, nice work! This resolves the issues I had, and it looks like
you found a needed fix already where things were not quite defined
properly.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists