linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/6] perf maps: Fixup maps_by_name when modifying maps_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250227215455.30514-5-acme@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:54:53 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] perf maps: Fixup maps_by_name when modifying maps_by_address

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>

We can't just replacing the map in the maps_by_address and not touching
on the maps_by_name, that would leave the refcount as 1 and thus trip
another consistency check, this one:

  perf: util/maps.c:110: check_invariants:
  	Assertion `refcount_read(map__refcnt(map)) > 1' failed.

  106         /*
  107          * Maps by name maps should be in maps_by_address, so
  108          * the reference count should be higher.
  109          */
  110         assert(refcount_read(map__refcnt(map)) > 1);

Committer notice:

Initialize the newly added 'ni' variable, that really can't be
accessed unitialized trips some gcc versions, like:

  12    20.00 archlinux:base                : FAIL gcc version 13.2.1 20230801 (GCC)
    util/maps.c: In function ‘__maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert’:
    util/maps.c:896:54: error: ‘ni’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
      896 |                                 map__put(maps_by_name[ni]);
          |                                                      ^
    util/maps.c:816:25: note: ‘ni’ was declared here
      816 |         unsigned int i, ni;
          |                         ^~
    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
    make[3]: *** [/git/perf-6.14.0-rc1/tools/build/Makefile.build:138: util] Error 2

Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Z79std66tPq-nqsD@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/maps.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/maps.c b/tools/perf/util/maps.c
index dec2e04696c9097e..dffc54a8a29bf3b0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/maps.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/maps.c
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static int __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *new)
 {
 	int err = 0;
 	FILE *fp = debug_file();
-	unsigned int i;
+	unsigned int i, ni = INT_MAX; // Some gcc complain, but depends on maps_by_name...
 
 	if (!maps__maps_by_address_sorted(maps))
 		__maps__sort_by_address(maps);
@@ -824,6 +824,7 @@ static int __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *new)
 	 */
 	for (i = first_ending_after(maps, new); i < maps__nr_maps(maps); ) {
 		struct map **maps_by_address = maps__maps_by_address(maps);
+		struct map **maps_by_name = maps__maps_by_name(maps);
 		struct map *pos = maps_by_address[i];
 		struct map *before = NULL, *after = NULL;
 
@@ -843,6 +844,9 @@ static int __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *new)
 			map__fprintf(pos, fp);
 		}
 
+		if (maps_by_name)
+			ni = maps__by_name_index(maps, pos);
+
 		/*
 		 * Now check if we need to create new maps for areas not
 		 * overlapped by the new map:
@@ -887,6 +891,12 @@ static int __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *new)
 		if (before) {
 			map__put(maps_by_address[i]);
 			maps_by_address[i] = before;
+
+			if (maps_by_name) {
+				map__put(maps_by_name[ni]);
+				maps_by_name[ni] = map__get(before);
+			}
+
 			/* Maps are still ordered, go to next one. */
 			i++;
 			if (after) {
@@ -908,6 +918,12 @@ static int __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *new)
 			 */
 			map__put(maps_by_address[i]);
 			maps_by_address[i] = map__get(new);
+
+			if (maps_by_name) {
+				map__put(maps_by_name[ni]);
+				maps_by_name[ni] = map__get(new);
+			}
+
 			err = __maps__insert_sorted(maps, i + 1, after, NULL);
 			map__put(after);
 			check_invariants(maps);
@@ -926,6 +942,12 @@ static int __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *new)
 				 */
 				map__put(maps_by_address[i]);
 				maps_by_address[i] = map__get(new);
+
+				if (maps_by_name) {
+					map__put(maps_by_name[ni]);
+					maps_by_name[ni] = map__get(new);
+				}
+
 				check_invariants(maps);
 				return err;
 			}
-- 
2.47.0