lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <o53nnmt5ypuoms3b37lehtmpwloudusr7647alehvnwsiltsyo@grd6ua7mh4o2>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 06:20:32 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>, Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, 
	Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks
 list

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:42:39AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/26/2025 10:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> >> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
> >> thus mark them as protected.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
> >>
> >> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
> >> the LPASS reset.
> >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 
> > I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
> > that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
> > 
> 
> I am not sure, I had got request to help boot the board which was not
> due to these clocks.

So, was the original submission in November 2023 broken or was it broken
by a later firmware upgrade which started to protect those clocks?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ