| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ab631e27-ee35-47b9-879b-2b8d6a245512@zhaoxin.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 17:39:48 +0800
From: LeoLiu-oc <leoliu-oc@...oxin.com>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
CC: <rafael@...nel.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>, <james.morse@....com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<robert.moore@...el.com>, <avadhut.naik@....com>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev>,
<CobeChen@...oxin.com>, <TonyWWang@...oxin.com>, <ErosZhang@...oxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] ACPI/APEI: Add hest_parse_pcie_aer()
在 2024/12/12 3:20, Yazen Ghannam 写道:
>
>
> [这封邮件来自外部发件人 谨防风险]
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 07:40:46PM +0800, LeoLiu-oc wrote:
>> From: LeoLiuoc <LeoLiu-oc@...oxin.com>
>>
>> The purpose of the function apei_hest_parse_aer() is used to parse and
>> extract register value from HEST PCIe AER structures. This applies to
>> all hardware platforms that has a PCI Express AER structure in HEST.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: LeoLiuoc <LeoLiu-oc@...oxin.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> include/acpi/apei.h | 17 +++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
>> index 20d757687e3d..13075f5aea25 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>> #include <linux/kdebug.h>
>> #include <linux/highmem.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <acpi/apei.h>
>> #include <acpi/ghes.h>
>> @@ -132,9 +133,81 @@ static bool is_ghes_assist_struct(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr)
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> -typedef int (*apei_hest_func_t)(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
>
> Why is this needed? The entire hest.c file is only built if
> CONFIG_ACPI_APEI is enabled.
>
I agree with your point.
>> +static bool hest_match_pci_devfn(struct acpi_hest_aer_common *p,
>> + struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + return ACPI_HEST_SEGMENT(p->bus) == pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) &&
>> + ACPI_HEST_BUS(p->bus) == dev->bus->number &&
>> + p->device == PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) &&
>> + p->function == PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn);
>
> It may be nice to align all these lines on the "==".
>
Okay, I will make the changes in the next version
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool hest_source_is_pcie_aer(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr,
>> + struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + u16 hest_type = hest_hdr->type;
>> + u8 pcie_type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
>> + struct acpi_hest_aer_common *common;
>> +
>> + common = (struct acpi_hest_aer_common *)(hest_hdr + 1);
>> +
>> + switch (hest_type) {
>> + case ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_ROOT_PORT:
>> + if (pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
>> + return false;
>> + break;
>
> The breaks should be indented to the "if". Same for the rest of the
> file.
>
I agree with your point of view and will make modifications in the next
version.
>> + case ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_ENDPOINT:
>> + if (pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT)
>> + return false;
>> + break;
>> + case ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_BRIDGE:
>> + if (pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE &&
>> + pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCIE_BRIDGE)
>> + return false;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (common->flags & ACPI_HEST_GLOBAL)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if (hest_match_pci_devfn(common, dev))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int hest_parse_pcie_aer(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct hest_parse_aer_info *info = data;
>> +
>> + if (!hest_source_is_pcie_aer(hest_hdr, info->pci_dev))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + switch (hest_hdr->type) {
>> + case ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_ROOT_PORT:
>> + info->hest_aer_root_port = (struct acpi_hest_aer_root *)hest_hdr;
>> + return 1;
>> + break;
>> + case ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_ENDPOINT:
>> + info->hest_aer_endpoint = (struct acpi_hest_aer *)hest_hdr;
>> + return 1;
>> + break;
>> + case ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_BRIDGE:
>> + info->hest_aer_bridge = (struct acpi_hest_aer_bridge *)hest_hdr;
>> + return 1;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return 0;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +#endif
>>
>> -static int apei_hest_parse(apei_hest_func_t func, void *data)
>> +int apei_hest_parse(apei_hest_func_t func, void *data)
>> {
>> struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr;
>> int i, rc, len;
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/apei.h b/include/acpi/apei.h
>> index dc60f7db5524..82d3cdf53e22 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/apei.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/apei.h
>> @@ -23,6 +23,15 @@ enum hest_status {
>> HEST_NOT_FOUND,
>> };
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
>> +struct hest_parse_aer_info {
>> + struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
>> + struct acpi_hest_aer *hest_aer_endpoint;
>> + struct acpi_hest_aer_root *hest_aer_root_port;
>> + struct acpi_hest_aer_bridge *hest_aer_bridge;
>
> These three pointers are mutually exclusive. Can you save just one
> pointer and then cast it when checking the "port_type" in patch 3?
>
>> +};
>> +#endif
>
> I think the #ifdef is not needed, because this is not declaring an
> instance of the struct.
>
I agree with your point of view and will make modifications in the next
version.
>> +
>> extern int hest_disable;
>> extern int erst_disable;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES
>> @@ -33,10 +42,18 @@ void __init acpi_ghes_init(void);
>> static inline void acpi_ghes_init(void) { }
>> #endif
>>
>> +typedef int (*apei_hest_func_t)(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data);
>> +int apei_hest_parse(apei_hest_func_t func, void *data);
>> +
>
> Minor nit: this could be done as a separate patch.
>
> Patch 1: Move apei_hest_parse() to apei.h
> Patch 2: Add new hest_parse_pcie_aer()
>
Ok, your suggestion is very reasonable, I will modify it in the next
version.
Leoliu-oc
Best Regards
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
>> void __init acpi_hest_init(void);
>> +int hest_parse_pcie_aer(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data);
>> #else
>> static inline void acpi_hest_init(void) { }
>> +static inline int hest_parse_pcie_aer(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> #endif
>>
>> int erst_write(const struct cper_record_header *record);
>> --
>
> Thanks,
> Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists