[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <174064309353.7700.4012102526424090624.b4-ty@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:58:16 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpiolib: fix bugs in retval sanitization
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:12:28 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Here's a set of fixes to issues spotted in next after queuing the series
> adding return value sanitization to GPIO core.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] gpiolib: don't use gpiochip_get_direction() when registering a chip
commit: 9becde08f1bc2857cd66f847eca2aaec3fc05c21
[2/3] gpiolib: use a more explicit retval logic in gpiochip_get_direction()
commit: cc78604fd4799a8e8e9d23ea4898acd6b605982d
[3/3] gpiolib: don't double-check the gc->get callback's existence
commit: 8a5680bffb2f681688b5788751c767fc380ff9b7
Best regards,
--
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists