lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250227092537.63053596@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:25:37 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 robh@...nel.org, steven.price@....com, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
 mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] drm/panfrost: Split LPAE MMU TRANSTAB register
 values

On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:30:41 -0300
Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com> wrote:

> The TRANSTAB (Translation table base address) layout is different
> depending on the legacy mode configuration.
> 
> Currently, the defined values apply to the legacy mode. Let's rename
> them so we can add the ones for no-legacy mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_regs.h | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_regs.h
> index b5f279a19a08..4e6064d5feaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_regs.h
> @@ -317,14 +317,19 @@
>  #define MMU_AS_STRIDE			(1 << MMU_AS_SHIFT)
>  
>  /*
> - * Begin LPAE MMU TRANSTAB register values
> + * Begin LPAE MMU TRANSTAB register values (legacy mode)
>   */
> -#define AS_TRANSTAB_LPAE_ADDR_SPACE_MASK	0xfffffffffffff000
> -#define AS_TRANSTAB_LPAE_ADRMODE_IDENTITY	0x2
> -#define AS_TRANSTAB_LPAE_ADRMODE_TABLE		0x3
> -#define AS_TRANSTAB_LPAE_ADRMODE_MASK		0x3
> -#define AS_TRANSTAB_LPAE_READ_INNER		BIT(2)
> -#define AS_TRANSTAB_LPAE_SHARE_OUTER		BIT(4)
> +#define AS_TRANSTAB_LEGACY_ADDR_SPACE_MASK	0xfffffffffffff000
> +#define AS_TRANSTAB_LEGACY_ADRMODE_IDENTITY	0x2
> +#define AS_TRANSTAB_LEGACY_ADRMODE_TABLE	0x3
> +#define AS_TRANSTAB_LEGACY_ADRMODE_MASK		0x3
> +#define AS_TRANSTAB_LEGACY_READ_INNER		BIT(2)
> +#define AS_TRANSTAB_LEGACY_SHARE_OUTER		BIT(4)

How about we keep AS_TRANSTAB_LPAE_ here and prefix the new reg values
with AS_xxx_AARCH64_ when there's a collision between the two formats.

> +
> +/*
> + * Begin LPAE MMU TRANSTAB register values (no-legacy mode)
> + */
> +#define AS_TRANSTAB_LPAE_ADDR_SPACE_MASK	0xfffffffffffffff0

It looks like we're not use AS_TRANSTAB_LPAE_ADDR_SPACE_MASK, so I'm
not sure it's worth defining the mask for the AARCH64 format.

>  
>  #define AS_STATUS_AS_ACTIVE			0x01
>  


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ