lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <PH7PR16MB61967386C0B6BA708CBCD9C6E5CD2@PH7PR16MB6196.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:47:43 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@...disk.com>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>, Oleksij Rempel
	<o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, "Rafael J.
 Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Søren Andersen <san@...v.dk>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 'Avri Altman' <avri.altman@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/6] mmc: core: add undervoltage handler for MMC/eMMC
 devices

> (+CC Avri and Adrian)
Personally, I don't have a strong opinion of any of this.
I expect the hw to handle ungraceful voltage drops via its internal mechanisms.
Up to some point, that is.

Thanks,
Avri
> 
> On 2/21/25 09:39, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Introduce `_mmc_handle_undervoltage()` to handle undervoltage events
> > for MMC/eMMC devices. This function interrupts ongoing operations
> > using High Priority Interrupt (HPI) and performs a controlled suspend.
> > After completing the sequence, the card is marked as removed to
> > prevent further interactions, ensuring that no further commands are
> > issued after an emergency stop.
> >
> > Implementation Details:
> > 1. **Interrupt ongoing operations**:
> >    - If the eMMC is executing a long-running operation (e.g., erase, trim,
> >      or write),
> >      attempt to stop it using HPI (`mmc_interrupt_hpi()`).
> >    - If HPI fails, an error is logged, but the sequence continues.
> >
> > 2. **Suspend the card in an emergency state**:
> >    - Call `__mmc_suspend()` with `is_undervoltage = true`, which ensures:
> >      - The power-off notification uses `EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_SHORT`.
> >      - Cache flushing is skipped to minimize time delays.
> >      - If power-off notify is unsupported, alternative methods like sleep
> >        or deselect are used to transition the card into a safe state.
> >
> > 3. **Mark the card as removed**:
> >    - This prevents further commands from being issued to the card after
> >      undervoltage shutdown, avoiding potential corruption.
> >
> > To support this, introduce `__mmc_suspend()` and `__mmc_resume()` as
> > internal  helpers that omit `mmc_claim_host()/mmc_release_host()`,
> > allowing them to be  called when the host is already claimed.
> >
> > The caller of `_mmc_handle_undervoltage()` is responsible for invoking
> > `mmc_claim_host()` before calling this function and
> > `mmc_release_host()` afterward to ensure exclusive access to the host
> > during the emergency shutdown process.
> >
> > Device Handling Considerations:
> > - **For eMMC storage**: The new undervoltage handler applies the correct
> >   power-down sequence using power-off notify or alternative methods.
> > - **For SD cards**: The current implementation does not handle
> undervoltage
> >   events for SD cards. Future extensions may be needed to implement proper
> >   handling.
> >
> > Testing:
> > This implementation was tested on an iMX8MP-based system, verifying
> > that the  undervoltage sequence correctly stops ongoing operations and
> > prevents further  MMC transactions after the event. The board had
> > approximately 100ms of available  power hold-up time. The Power Off
> > Notification was sent ~4ms after the board  was detached from the
> > power supply, allowing sufficient time for the eMMC to  handle the
> > event properly.
> >
> > The testing was performed using a logic analyzer to monitor command
> > sequences and timing. While this method confirms that the expected
> > sequence was executed, it does not provide insights into the actual
> > internal behavior of the eMMC storage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > changes v3:
> > - reword commit message.
> > - add comments in the code
> > - do not try to resume sleeping device
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 115
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index
> > 9270bde445ad..a50cdd550a22 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> > @@ -2104,8 +2104,8 @@ static int _mmc_flush_cache(struct mmc_host
> *host)
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int _mmc_suspend(struct mmc_host *host, bool is_suspend,
> > -			bool is_undervoltage)
> > +static int __mmc_suspend(struct mmc_host *host, bool is_suspend,
> > +			 bool is_undervoltage)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned int notify_type;
> >  	int err = 0;
> > @@ -2116,8 +2116,6 @@ static int _mmc_suspend(struct mmc_host
> *host, bool is_suspend,
> >  	else
> >  		notify_type = EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_LONG;
> >
> > -	mmc_claim_host(host);
> > -
> >  	if (mmc_card_suspended(host->card))
> >  		goto out;
> >
> > @@ -2145,7 +2143,18 @@ static int _mmc_suspend(struct mmc_host
> *host, bool is_suspend,
> >  		mmc_card_set_suspended(host->card);
> >  	}
> >  out:
> > +	return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int _mmc_suspend(struct mmc_host *host, bool is_suspend,
> > +			bool is_undervoltage)
> > +{
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	mmc_claim_host(host);
> > +	err = __mmc_suspend(host, is_suspend, is_undervoltage);
> >  	mmc_release_host(host);
> > +
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -2165,6 +2174,20 @@ static int mmc_suspend(struct mmc_host
> *host)
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int __mmc_resume(struct mmc_host *host) {
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	if (!mmc_card_suspended(host->card))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	mmc_power_up(host, host->card->ocr);
> > +	err = mmc_init_card(host, host->card->ocr, host->card);
> > +	mmc_card_clr_suspended(host->card);
> > +
> > +	return err;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * This function tries to determine if the same card is still present
> >   * and, if so, restore all state to it.
> > @@ -2174,16 +2197,9 @@ static int _mmc_resume(struct mmc_host
> *host)
> >  	int err = 0;
> >
> >  	mmc_claim_host(host);
> > -
> > -	if (!mmc_card_suspended(host->card))
> > -		goto out;
> > -
> > -	mmc_power_up(host, host->card->ocr);
> > -	err = mmc_init_card(host, host->card->ocr, host->card);
> > -	mmc_card_clr_suspended(host->card);
> > -
> > -out:
> > +	err = __mmc_resume(host);
> >  	mmc_release_host(host);
> > +
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -2194,6 +2210,13 @@ static int mmc_shutdown(struct mmc_host
> *host)
> > {
> >  	int err = 0;
> >
> > +	/*
> > +	 * In case of undervoltage, the card will be powered off by
> > +	 * _mmc_handle_undervoltage()
> > +	 */
> > +	if (host->undervoltage)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * In a specific case for poweroff notify, we need to resume the card
> >  	 * before we can shutdown it properly.
> > @@ -2285,6 +2308,71 @@ static int _mmc_hw_reset(struct mmc_host
> *host)
> >  	return mmc_init_card(host, card->ocr, card);  }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * _mmc_handle_undervoltage - Handle an undervoltage event for
> > +MMC/eMMC devices
> > + * @host: MMC host structure
> > + *
> > + * This function is triggered when an undervoltage condition is detected.
> > + * It attempts to safely stop ongoing operations and transition the
> > +device
> > + * into a low-power or safe state to prevent data corruption.
> > + *
> > + * Steps performed:
> > + * 1. If no card is present, return immediately.
> > + * 2. Attempt to interrupt any ongoing operations using High Priority
> Interrupt
> > + *    (HPI).
> > + * 3. Perform an emergency suspend using EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_SHORT if
> possible.
> > + *    - If power-off notify is not supported, fallback mechanisms like sleep or
> > + *      deselecting the card are attempted.
> > + *    - Cache flushing is skipped to reduce execution time.
> > + * 4. Mark the card as removed to prevent further interactions after
> > + *    undervoltage.
> 
> The good path now looks like the best bet to me.
> The PON fallbacks are still questionable IMO.
> Deselect, if taking the spec seriously, cannot really give a hint to FTL.
> While daisy-chaining MMC and SD is rather rare these days, that's still the
> behavior vendors implement AFAIK.
> Sleep with it's vendor-defined timeouts can be anything, so this could even
> trigger a cache flush internally, after we avoided sending one because of
> undervoltage.
> If we were to rely on actually getting 100ms heads-up we could check that
> against the timeout reported by the card, but IME those are wild guesses
> rather than measured values.
> 
> > + *
> > + * Note: This function does not handle host claiming or releasing. The caller
> > + *	 must ensure that the host is properly claimed before calling this
> > + *	 function and released afterward.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: 0 on success, or a negative error code if any step fails.
> > + */
> > +static int _mmc_handle_undervoltage(struct mmc_host *host) {
> > +	struct mmc_card *card = host->card;
> > +	int err = 0;
> > +
> > +	/* If there is no card attached, nothing to do */
> > +	if (!card)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Try to interrupt a long-running operation (such as an erase, trim,
> > +	 * or write) using High Priority Interrupt (HPI). This helps ensure
> > +	 * the card is in a safe state before power loss.
> 
> I don't know about safe state before power loss, it's getting it in a state where
> we can execute the below.
> 
> > +	 */
> > +	err = mmc_interrupt_hpi(card);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		pr_err("%s: Interrupt HPI failed, error %d\n",
> > +			mmc_hostname(host), err);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Perform an emergency suspend to power off the eMMC quickly.
> > +	 * This ensures the device enters a safe state before power is lost.
> > +	 * We first attempt EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_SHORT, but if power-off
> notify
> > +	 * is not supported, we fall back to sleep mode or deselecting the card.
> > +	 * Cache flushing is skipped to minimize delay.
> > +	 */
> > +	err = __mmc_suspend(host, false, true);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		pr_err("%s: error %d doing suspend\n",
> mmc_hostname(host), err);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Mark the card as removed to prevent further operations.
> > +	 * This ensures the system does not attempt to access the device
> > +	 * after an undervoltage event, avoiding potential corruption.
> > +	 */
> > +	mmc_card_set_removed(card);
> > +
> > +	return err;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct mmc_bus_ops mmc_ops = {
> >  	.remove = mmc_remove,
> >  	.detect = mmc_detect,
> > @@ -2297,6 +2385,7 @@ static const struct mmc_bus_ops mmc_ops = {
> >  	.hw_reset = _mmc_hw_reset,
> >  	.cache_enabled = _mmc_cache_enabled,
> >  	.flush_cache = _mmc_flush_cache,
> > +	.handle_undervoltage = _mmc_handle_undervoltage,
> >  };
> >
> >  /*
> 
> No need to resend anything at this point, I'm curious what others have to say
> on the series.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ