linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb/symbols: follow up on refactoring for const struct bin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250227010508.GA392458-mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 17:05:08 -0800
From: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>
To: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@...onical.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Etienne Buira <etienne.buira@...e.fr>,
	Andrew Ballance <andrewjballance@...il.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb/symbols: follow up on refactoring for const
 struct bin_attribute

On 2025-02-27 09:59:23 +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> 
> Sorry for the delayed response.
> I have no objections. Please go ahead and submit your patch. There is no
> need to mention this original submission, nor CC me.
> 
> Thanks!

Koichiro - You reported this issue first and came up with a fix for it.
Unless you do not want to, I think you should the one who fixes this
bug. How about you re-submit a patch with combination of your original
patch and the diff I posted?