[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250228022354.2624249-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:23:54 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: bypass root memcg check for skmem charging
The root memcg is never associated with a socket in mem_cgroup_sk_alloc,
so there is no need to check if the given memcg is root for the skmem
charging code path.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f571c67ab088..55b0e9482c00 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4879,7 +4879,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages,
if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
return memcg1_charge_skmem(memcg, nr_pages, gfp_mask);
- if (try_charge(memcg, gfp_mask, nr_pages) == 0) {
+ if (try_charge_memcg(memcg, gfp_mask, nr_pages) == 0) {
mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_SOCK, nr_pages);
return true;
}
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists