[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250228132953.78a2b788@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:29:53 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Lin Feng <linf@...gsu.com>, Linux
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Stefano Jordhani <sjordhani@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the vfs-brauner
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
fs/eventpoll.c
between commit:
d3a194d95fc8 ("epoll: simplify ep_busy_loop by removing always 0 argument")
from the vfs-brauner tree and commit:
b9d752105e5f ("net: use napi_id_valid helper")
from the net-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/eventpoll.c
index 9b06a0ab9c32,2fecf66661e9..000000000000
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@@ -447,8 -447,8 +447,8 @@@ static bool ep_busy_loop(struct eventpo
if (!budget)
budget = BUSY_POLL_BUDGET;
- if (napi_id >= MIN_NAPI_ID && ep_busy_loop_on(ep)) {
+ if (napi_id_valid(napi_id) && ep_busy_loop_on(ep)) {
- napi_busy_loop(napi_id, nonblock ? NULL : ep_busy_loop_end,
+ napi_busy_loop(napi_id, ep_busy_loop_end,
ep, prefer_busy_poll, budget);
if (ep_events_available(ep))
return true;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists