lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8HXIvAZcvNY72Jx@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:32:50 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hongxing.zhu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: imx95: add PCIe's msi-map and iommu-map
 property

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:08:58AM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2025, 17:39:47 CET schrieb Frank Li:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 08:54:13AM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > > Hi Frank,
> > >
> > > Am Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2025, 17:31:26 CET schrieb Frank Li:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:11:37PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > > > > Hi Frank,
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Dienstag, 28. Januar 2025, 22:15:58 CET schrieb Frank Li:
> > > > > > Add PCIe's msi-map and iommu-map property because i.MX95 support smmu and
> > > > > > its.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi
> > > > > > index 6b8470cb3461a..2cebeda43a52d 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi
> > > > > > @@ -1573,6 +1573,12 @@ pcie0: pcie@...00000 {
> > > > > >  			assigned-clock-parents = <0>, <0>,
> > > > > >  						 <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_SYSPLL1_PFD1_DIV2>;
> > > > > >  			power-domains = <&scmi_devpd IMX95_PD_HSIO_TOP>;
> > > > > > +			/* pcie0's Devid(BIT[7:6]) is 0x00, stream id(BIT[5:0]) is 0x10~0x17 */
> > > > > > +			msi-map = <0x0 &its 0x10 0x1>,
> > > > > > +				  <0x100 &its 0x11 0x7>;
> > > > >
> > > > > Aren't you missing msi-map-mask = <0x1ff>; here? Similar to pcie1.
> > > > > Either way, with this change PCIe on pcie0 is not working anymore,
> > > > > regardless of msi-map-mask.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it should have msi-map-mask. During my test, I have not enable enetc
> > > > so I have not found this problem.
> > >
> > > Just to be clear: This is not about enetc. This works fine here.
> > >
> > > > > Without msi-map-mask:
> > > > > > OF: /soc/pcie@...00000: iommu-map, using mask 000001ff, id-base: 00000100, out-base: 00000011, length: 00000007, id: 00000300 -> 00000011
> > > > > > OF: /soc/pcie@...00000: no msi-map translation for id 0x300 on (null)
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: error -EINVAL: enable failure
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: probe with driver r8169 failed with error -22
> > > > >
> > > > > With msi-map-mask:
> > > > > > OF: /soc/pcie@...00000: iommu-map, using mask 000001ff, id-base: 00000100, out-base: 00000011, length: 00000007, id: 00000300 -> 00000011
> > > > > > OF: /soc/pcie@...00000: msi-map, using mask 000001ff, id-base: 00000100, out-base: 00000011, length: 00000007, id: 00000300 -> 00000011
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling Mem-Wr-Inval
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: error -EIO: PCI read failed
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: probe with driver r8169 failed with error -5
> > > >
> > > > Can you try remove iommu-map and keep msi-map? then remove msi-map and
> > > > keep iommu-map to check which one cause this problem.
> > >
> > > With only msi-map removed, but smmu enabled:
> > > > arm-smmu-v3 490d0000.iommu: event 0x10 received:
> > > > arm-smmu-v3 490d0000.iommu:      0x0000001100000010
> > > > arm-smmu-v3 490d0000.iommu:      0x0000020a00000000
> > > > arm-smmu-v3 490d0000.iommu:      0x000000009b0cc000
> > > > arm-smmu-v3 490d0000.iommu:      0x0000000000000000
> > > > arm-smmu-v3 490d0000.iommu: event: F_TRANSLATION client: 0000:01:00.0 sid: 0x11 ssid: 0x0 iova: 0x9b0cc000 ipa: 0x0
> > > > arm-smmu-v3 490d0000.iommu: priv data read s1 "Input address caused fault" stag: 0x0 r8169 0000:03:00.0
> > > > enp3s0: Link is Down
> > >
> > > With only iommu-map removed, both smmu enabled or disabled:
> > > > OF: /soc/pcie@...00000: msi-map, using mask 000001ff, id-base: 00000100, out-base: 00000011, length: 00000007, id: 00000300 -> 00000011
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling Mem-Wr-Inval
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: error -EIO: PCI read failed
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: probe with driver r8169 failed with error -5
> > >
> > > Only if smmu is disabled and msi-map is removed the driver probes
> > > successfully:
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling Mem-Wr-Inval
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0 eth0: RTL8168g/8111g, d8:9d:b9:00:16:10, XID 4c0, IRQ 160
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0 eth0: jumbo features [frames: 9194 bytes, tx checksumming: ko]
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0 enp3s0: renamed from eth0
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling bus mastering
> > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0 enp3s0: Link is Down
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Without msi-map/iommu-map:
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling Mem-Wr-Inval
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0 eth0: RTL8168g/8111g, d8:9d:b9:00:16:10, XID 4c0, IRQ 166
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0 eth0: jumbo features [frames: 9194 bytes, tx checksumming: ko]
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0 enp3s0: renamed from eth0
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0: enabling bus mastering
> > > > > > r8169 0000:03:00.0 enp3s0: Link is Down
> > > > >
> > > > > pcie1 works as expected. But this is only a single PCIe device, rather than
> > > > > having a PCIe bridge.
> > > > > Any idea what's wrong here?
> > > >
> > > > Can you help dump more information at for PCIe bridge case:
> > > >
> > > > imx_pcie_add_lut(), need rid and sid information.
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > >
> > > Just to be clear, without msi-map and iommu-map I get:
> > > > imx6q-pcie 4c380000.pcie: rid: 0x0, sid: 0x18
> > > > imx6q-pcie 4c380000.pcie: rid: 0x100, sid: 0x19
> >
> > Can you help dump register value PE0_LUT_CREQID offset 0x101 for your
> > smmu-map or msi-map enable case
>
> I am assuming you meant offset 0x101c, as stated in the RM.
> I added a dump directly before printing "PCI read failed" in r8169_main.c.

Can you point me the code about where "error -EIO: PCI read failed"?

I tested nvme devices worked at both PCIE0 and PCIE1.

Which PCI switch do you use?

Frank

> Unfortunately this only returns 0 for both PCIe devices, so I'm wondering
> if this is correct.
>
> > 2nd test.
> > change IMX95_PE0_LUT_MASK to 0x1ff
>
> Unfortunately I do not notice any effect/difference.
>
> Best regards
> Alexander
> --
> TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
> Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
> Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
> http://www.tq-group.com/
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ