[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9ng6AqmDynFebR+2_ZEpmvxkUNWdTed2vr0kede0dxcxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:40:19 -0500
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] rust: add #[export] macro
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 7:40 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Rust has two different tools for generating function declarations to
> call across the FFI boundary:
>
> * bindgen. Generates Rust declarations from a C header.
> * cbindgen. Generates C headers from Rust declarations.
>
> In the kernel, we only use bindgen. This is because cbindgen assumes a
> cargo-based buildsystem, so it is not compatible with the kernel's build
> system. This means that when C code calls a Rust function by name, its
> signature must be duplicated in both Rust code and a C header, and the
> signature needs to be kept in sync manually.
This needs an update given Miguel's comments on the cover letter. I
wonder if the code should also justify the choice (over cbindgen).
> To eliminate this manual checking, introduce a new macro that verifies
> at compile time that the two function declarations use the same
> signature. The idea is to run the C declaration through bindgen, and
> then have rustc verify that the function pointers have the same type.
>
> The signature must still be written twice, but at least you can no
> longer get it wrong. If the signatures don't match, you will get errors
> that look like this:
>
> error[E0308]: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
> --> <linux>/rust/kernel/print.rs:22:22
> |
> 21 | #[export]
> | --------- expected because of this
> 22 | unsafe extern "C" fn rust_fmt_argument(
> | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `u8`, found `i8`
> |
> = note: expected fn item `unsafe extern "C" fn(*mut u8, *mut u8, *mut c_void) -> *mut u8 {bindings::rust_fmt_argument}`
> found fn item `unsafe extern "C" fn(*mut i8, *mut i8, *const c_void) -> *mut i8 {print::rust_fmt_argument}`
>
> It is unfortunate that the error message starts out by saying "`if` and
> `else` have incompatible types", but I believe the rest of the error
> message is reasonably clear and not too confusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> ---
> rust/kernel/prelude.rs | 2 +-
> rust/macros/export.rs | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> rust/macros/helpers.rs | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> rust/macros/lib.rs | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/prelude.rs b/rust/kernel/prelude.rs
> index dde2e0649790..889102f5a81e 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/prelude.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/prelude.rs
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> pub use crate::alloc::{flags::*, Box, KBox, KVBox, KVVec, KVec, VBox, VVec, Vec};
>
> #[doc(no_inline)]
> -pub use macros::{module, pin_data, pinned_drop, vtable, Zeroable};
> +pub use macros::{export, module, pin_data, pinned_drop, vtable, Zeroable};
>
> pub use super::{build_assert, build_error};
>
> diff --git a/rust/macros/export.rs b/rust/macros/export.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c5ec75f2b07f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/macros/export.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +use crate::helpers::function_name;
> +use proc_macro::TokenStream;
> +
> +/// Please see [`crate::export`] for documentation.
> +pub(crate) fn export(_attr: TokenStream, ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
> + let Some(name) = function_name(ts.clone()) else {
> + return "::core::compile_error!(\"The #[export] attribute must be used on a function.\");"
> + .parse::<TokenStream>()
> + .unwrap();
> + };
Could you also show in the commit message what this error looks like
when the macro is misused?
> +
> + // This verifies that the function has the same signature as the declaration generated by
> + // bindgen. It makes use of the fact that all branches of an if/else must have the same type.
> + let signature_check = quote!(
> + const _: () = {
> + if true {
> + ::kernel::bindings::#name
> + } else {
> + #name
> + };
> + };
> + );
> +
> + let no_mangle = "#[no_mangle]".parse::<TokenStream>().unwrap();
Would this be simpler as `let no_mangle = quote!("#[no_mangle]");`?
> + TokenStream::from_iter([signature_check, no_mangle, ts])
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/macros/helpers.rs b/rust/macros/helpers.rs
> index 563dcd2b7ace..3e04f8ecfc74 100644
> --- a/rust/macros/helpers.rs
> +++ b/rust/macros/helpers.rs
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> -use proc_macro::{token_stream, Group, TokenStream, TokenTree};
> +use proc_macro::{token_stream, Group, Ident, TokenStream, TokenTree};
>
> pub(crate) fn try_ident(it: &mut token_stream::IntoIter) -> Option<String> {
> if let Some(TokenTree::Ident(ident)) = it.next() {
> @@ -215,3 +215,20 @@ pub(crate) fn parse_generics(input: TokenStream) -> (Generics, Vec<TokenTree>) {
> rest,
> )
> }
> +
> +/// Given a function declaration, finds the name of the function.
> +pub(crate) fn function_name(input: TokenStream) -> Option<Ident> {
> + let mut input = input.into_iter();
> + while let Some(token) = input.next() {
> + match token {
> + TokenTree::Ident(i) if i.to_string() == "fn" => {
> + if let Some(TokenTree::Ident(i)) = input.next() {
> + return Some(i);
> + }
> + return None;
> + }
> + _ => continue,
> + }
> + }
> + None
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/macros/lib.rs b/rust/macros/lib.rs
> index d61bc6a56425..fbb2860e991f 100644
> --- a/rust/macros/lib.rs
> +++ b/rust/macros/lib.rs
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #[macro_use]
> mod quote;
> mod concat_idents;
> +mod export;
> mod helpers;
> mod module;
> mod paste;
> @@ -174,6 +175,29 @@ pub fn vtable(attr: TokenStream, ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
> vtable::vtable(attr, ts)
> }
>
> +/// Export a function so that C code can call it via a header file.
> +///
> +/// Functions exported using this macro can be called from C code using the declaration in the
> +/// appropriate header file. It should only be used in cases where C calls the function through a
> +/// header file; cases where C calls into Rust via a function pointer in a vtable (such as
> +/// `file_operations`) should not use this macro.
> +///
> +/// This macro has the following effect:
> +///
> +/// * Disables name mangling for this function.
> +/// * Verifies at compile-time that the function signature matches the declaration in the header
> +/// file.
> +///
> +/// You must declare the signature of the Rust function in a header file that is included by
> +/// `rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h`.
> +///
> +/// This macro is *not* the same as the C macros `EXPORT_SYMBOL_*`, since all Rust symbols are
> +/// currently automatically exported with `EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL`.
nit: "since" implies causation, which isn't the case, I think.
Consider if ", since" can be replaced with a semicolon.
> +#[proc_macro_attribute]
> +pub fn export(attr: TokenStream, ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
> + export::export(attr, ts)
> +}
> +
> /// Concatenate two identifiers.
> ///
> /// This is useful in macros that need to declare or reference items with names
>
> --
> 2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog
Minor comments.
Reviewed-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists