[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41ec1b2e-0a82-4712-926d-ac73a7151e61@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:42:41 -0800
From: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
mhklinux@...look.com, decui@...rosoft.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
joro@...tes.org, robin.murphy@....com, arnd@...db.de,
jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com, muminulrussell@...il.com,
skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com, mrathor@...ux.microsoft.com,
ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com, apais@...ux.microsoft.com,
Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com, stanislav.kinsburskiy@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, vkuznets@...hat.com, prapal@...ux.microsoft.com,
muislam@...rosoft.com, anrayabh@...ux.microsoft.com, rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] x86/mshyperv: Add support for extended Hyper-V
features
On 2/27/2025 4:17 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> On 2/27/2025 9:59 AM, Roman Kisel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/26/2025 3:07 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
>>> From: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com>
>> [...]
>>> - pr_info("Hyper-V: privilege flags low 0x%x, high 0x%x, hints 0x%x, misc 0x%x\n",
>>> - ms_hyperv.features, ms_hyperv.priv_high, ms_hyperv.hints,
>>> + pr_info("Hyper-V: privilege flags low 0x%x, high 0x%x, ext 0x%x, hints 0x%x, misc 0x%x\n",
>>> + ms_hyperv.features, ms_hyperv.priv_high,
>>> + ms_hyperv.ext_features, ms_hyperv.hints,
>>> ms_hyperv.misc_features);
>>
>> Would using %#x instead of 0x%x be better in your opinion?
>>
> It's a reasonable suggestion. I'm not sure if it's worth another
> version, if this patch seems good enough to merge as-is.
> However if I'm doing another version of this series that still
> includes this patch, then I can certainly make the change.
>
You're right, a suggestion like that shouldn't warrant another version,
agreed! Whether you implement that tweak or not, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Thanks!
>
>> [..]
>
--
Thank you,
Roman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists